Forum topic

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
ges1514
USGIV venous targets

Looking for something beyond anecdotal and research based on best practice regarding USGIV placement by staff not involved with VAT...ie ED, ICU...ect. VAT are facing challenges with support staff placing/attempting USGIV in upper arms with less than stellar results. Most research Im pulling encourages selecting these upper arm veins to drastically improve success rates but doesnt address the challenges of VAT following up post failure. Ranging from poor imaging due to bruising, infiltration, decreased patient satisfaction, or worst case-inability to place midline/picc and refer to IR for tunneled catheter.  Throw into the mix, limb restricted patients entering into system, can be frustrating. "Common sense" and theorectical logic is not gaining traction. Heels are dug in wanting evidence and research as VAT steer policy to keeping all attempts below antecubital fossa or passing on challenging attempts. Even stepping in to these units has been offered but still in limbo. Look forward to some input.

Greg

lynncrni
USG PIVCs in the upper arm

USG PIVCs in the upper arm MUST be long enough to allow for 2/3 of catheter length to reside inside the vein lumen, known as vein purchase. If these other nurses do not have access to catheters that are 2-3 inches, they are highly likely to fail prematurely for various reasons. Research is what produces the standard of practice which can also be considered as best practice. Read now INS SOP on VAscular Visualiation, VAD Planning, Site Selection. YOu will not find anything stating that nurses or any clinician working in XXX dept is not allowed to use US for PIVC insertion. The issue is competency and competency assessment, also addressed in the INS SOP. 

 

Lynn Hadaway, M.Ed., RN, NPD-BC, CRNI

Lynn Hadaway Associates, Inc.

PO Box 10

Milner, GA 30257

Website http://www.hadawayassociates.com

Office Phone 770-358-7861

Log in or register to post comments