Forum topic

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
Heather Nichols
Single or dual port?

     I had a patient this week that came in with a single port for chemo, but needed a picc before it was all over due to the amount of things being infused.  The port gave the nurse fits, and upon further investigation, we found out it had pinch off (left subclavian) and was possibly leaking (dye study).  Long story short, I told the doc it would have to be replaced, preferably thru the jugular, and a dual port to ensure he has enough access next time.  The doc asked me if a dual held more chance for infection then a single due to the extra hardware.  I could not find anything specific to answer that question.  I would not think so if it was not accessed, and I would also think there is a higher chance for infection with the addition of a PICC, which would  have the chance to infect the port.  Anybody know?  I am stumped on this one, and this doc is a pretty smart cookie.  I would like some proper info to give him. 

 

Thanks!  Heather

lynncrni
I am in the process of
I am in the process of looking through all the literature on CRBSI now. There are several articles on single vs multiple lumens and their infection risk, but these are all looking at external hubs. I have not found any that examined the risk with dual lumen implanted ports. Most of these articles conclude that multiple lumens may create an added risk but a multiple lumen catheter is better than multiple catheters because of the insertion-related complications when more than one insertion is performed. Lynn

Lynn Hadaway, M.Ed., RN, NPD-BC, CRNI

Lynn Hadaway Associates, Inc.

PO Box 10

Milner, GA 30257

Website http://www.hadawayassociates.com

Office Phone 770-358-7861

Heather Nichols
  Thanks Lynn.  That makes
  Thanks Lynn.  That makes sense to me also, but you know these doc's.......
Log in or register to post comments